Salvaging Assets: Considering Alternatives to School Closure

salvaging_assets[pdf] Closing bad schools is necessary to maintain quality in a system based on performance accountability. However, even “failing” schools may have pockets of strength and/or “assets” that are worth preserving: a committed parent body, high-quality teachers, a valuable school building in a tight real estate market. In this report, prepared for the Center on Reinventing Public Education’s National Charter School Research Project, Lucy Steiner and Bryan Hassel draw upon interviews with high-quality charter school authorizers and school districts to offer a framework and preliminary lessons for considering alternatives to school closures. Three approaches — installation of new leaders, school reconstitution (where governance structures and personnel are replaced but students remain) and facility acquisition (new school operator takes over a failing school’s facility) — have shown promise for intervening in failing schools when closure is not the best option.

Featured

Going Exponential

How could every low-income child have access to the very best schools by 2025?
Click here to find out

Opportunity Culture

How a new focus on America’s best teachers could close the achievement gaps, raise the bar, and keep our nation great.
Read More


Try, Try Again

Triple Your Turnaround Success Rate... Without Getting Better at Turning Around Schools.
Find out how here. (pdf)

3X for All

What would it take for every child to have an outstanding teacher, every year?

Click here to see our white paper (pdf):
3X for All: Extending the Reach of Education’s Best.


kid-red-20 Sign Up For Our E-Updates

Subscribe to email updates about our work:
Receive

Having trouble viewing these publications?
adobe_download